Go to Content Area :::

Constitutional Court R.O.C. (Taiwan) Logo

Home Sitemap 中文版
   

Decisions

Home > Decisions > Interpretations (before 2022)
:::
:::
  • Interpretation
  • No.339【Under Translation】
  • Date
  • 1994/02/25
  • Issue
    • Is Article 18, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 12, of the Commodity Tax Act excessive and contradictory to the Constitution?
  • Holding
    •        Article 18, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 12 of the Commodity Tax Act, as amended and promulgated on January 9, 1971, provides that a fine equal to two to ten times the amount of tax evaded shall be imposed on a taxpayer for failure to affix tax-paid or tax-free certificates on packages or containers for commodities in accordance with the law, regardless of whether there actually was any tax evasion (this provision has been amended).  Such sanction exceeds the necessary degree of punishment and contradicts the purpose of the Constitution, i.e., to protect the rights of the people.  The directive of the Ministry of Finance dated December 20, 1977 (Tai-Tzai-Sue-Zu No. 38572), that any failure to affix examination certificates in accordance with the law shall be treated as an evasion of tax and subject to fines under the same provision regardless of whether there  actually was any tax evasion, shall be disregarded.
  • Reasoning
    •        Article 18, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 12 of the Commodity Tax Act, as amended and promulgated on January 9, 1971, provides that a monetary fine equal to from two to ten times the tax amount evaded shall be imposed on a tax payer for failure to affix tax-paid or tax-free certificates on packages or containers for commodities in accordance with the law, regardless of whether there actually was any tax evasion (this provision has been amended).  Such provision is for tax assessment purposes and to provide a deterrent to any tax evasion.  The sanctions under the tax laws can be divided into sanctions against the commitment of law-violating acts and the evasion of assessable tax. If there is only a violation of the obligations to perform or not to perform under the tax laws without any tax evasion, the sanction against such violation, being regarded as the same as tax evasion, exceeds the degree of punishment necessary and contradicts the purpose of the Constitution, i.e., to protect the rights of the people.
      
    • The directive of the Ministry of Finance dated December 20, 1977 (Tai-Tzai-Sue-Zu No. 38572), which stated, pursuant to the above provision of law, that any failure to affix examination certificates in accordance with the law shall be treated as an evasion of tax and be subject to fines under the same provision regardless of whether there actually was any tax evasion, shall therefore be disregarded.
      
    • *Translated by John C. Chen, Attorney at Law.
      
Back Top